A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate assignment (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliography— see the bottom of the next page), but more often it is part of the introduction to an essay. Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources (eg dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work the purpose is to offer an overview of. While a summary of the what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature it focuses on a specific topic of interest to you and includes a critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work. Component #1 overview of your research focus: introduce the problem/issue you will focus on, but get to your specific focus quickly this part should not review everything you have learned about the research problem/topic choose only what is relevant to help explain your focus and set up the literature you will review. Essential in any field of study, a literature review lists and synthesizes previous scholarship and shows the scope, focus, limitations, and direction of your own research. To some extent, particularly with postgraduate research, the literature review can become a project in itself it is an important showcase of your talents of: understanding, interpretation, analysis, clarity of thought, synthesis, and development of argument the process of conducting and reporting your literature review can help.
A literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, dissertations, conference proceedings and other resources which are relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory and provides context for a dissertation by identifying past research research tells a story and the existing literature helps us identify where we. There are two kinds of literature reviews you might write at university: one that students are asked to write as a stand-alone assignment in a course, often as part of their training in the research processes in their ﬁeld, and the other that is written as part of an introduction to, or preparation for, a longer work, usually a thesis or. The purpose of the literature review is to provide a critical written account of the current state of research on a selected topic: identifies areas of prior scholarship places each source in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the specific issue, area of research, or theory under review describes. Here's another way of describing those four main tasks a literature review: demonstrates a familiarity with a body of knowledge and establishes the credibility of your work summarises prior research and says how your project is linked to it integrates and summarises what is known about a subject demonstrates that you.
A literature review is an evaluative report of information found in the literature related to your selected area of study the review should describe, summarise, evaluate and clarify this literature it should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your research. While there might be many reasons for conducting a literature review, following are four key outcomes of doing the review assessment of the current state of research on a topic this is probably the most obvious value of the literature review once a researcher has determined an area to work with for a research project,.
A literature review is an opportunity to tell your story by carving a space for your topic and research question in relation to previous studies in reporting your critical perspective on the relevant literature and identifying a gap that your research will attempt to address, it situates and establishes the importance of your topic or. In many cases, reviewers of the literature will have published studies relevant to the review they are writing this could create a conflict of interest: how can reviewers report objectively on their own work  some scientists may be overly.